I found it very interesting, listening to some of the debate today, that there seems to be some policymakers in the Senate who haven't come to understand that when another nation pegs its currency, rather than letting it float, it does so deliberately to put in effect what is essentially a tariff against imports. In our case, that is a tariff against American imports, and in some cases it provides a subsidy to exports. Now, here we are in America. Why would we say it is OK for China to peg its currency in a fashion that puts a tariff against American products and subsidizes Chinese exports to America? Because that is guaranteed to strip jobs out of America. Why would some Members of this Chamber consider that to be just fine? I am puzzled by that, and I am wondering if the Senator could help me understand.
Share & report
More from Jeff Merkley
Mr. President, families lose, billionaires win. That is the Republican plan. The Republican plan slashes $2 trillion for the programs families depend on to thrive in order to give more tax giveaways to the very richest Americans. Families…
Madam President, I call up my amendment No. 1758 and ask that it be reported by number. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the amendment by number. The legislative clerk read as follows: The Senator from Oregon [Mr. Merkley]…
Mr. President, colleagues, let me keep this very simple. We provided a lot of funding in the Inflation Reduction Act so that those who have very sophisticated finances and very powerful advisers that try to avoid ever paying their taxes…
I ask for the yeas and nays. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second? There appears to be a sufficient second. The clerk will call the roll. The legislative clerk called the roll. The result was announced--yeas 47, nays 53, as…





