Mr. Chair, I am shocked that my colleague would propose an amendment that would strike all funding for bilateral family planning. These services prevent unintended pregnancies, maternal deaths, and abortions; reduce rates of infant and child mortality; empower women to stay in school and join the workforce; create stronger and healthier families; and improve economies. Aren't these bipartisan policy outcomes that both sides of the aisle should be supporting? Family planning does exactly what it says: It helps women plan when to have a family. But, as we sit here today, more than 200 million women around the world still lack access to modern contraceptives. If we want to build the self-reliance of countries, one of the most cost-effective measures is to increase access to the family planning services that women so desperately seek. Mr. Chair, I ask my colleagues to oppose this amendment. I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Lee), a member of the State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Subcommittee.
Share & report
More from Nita Lowey
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Visclosky), the chairman of the Subcommittee on Defense, who has spent the last 35 years in the Congress. Mr. Speaker, we all share his knowledge, which…
Mr. Speaker, I have a motion at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will designate the motion. The text of the motion is as follows: Mrs. Lowey moves that the House concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 133 with an amendment…
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 5 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Scott), the chairman of the Committee on Education and Labor.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H.J. Res. 110, currently under consideration. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there…





