Mr. Chair, I rise to support the amendment. When, in March, the Justice Department broke with the principle that its core mission should be to defend, not sabotage, the law of the land, it went too far. The White House is entitled to push its own policy position on healthcare--it has made no secret of its hostility to the Affordable Care Act, despite never offering an alternative of any kind--but it cannot pick and choose which laws to support. My friends across the aisle criticized the Obama administration for its use of prosecutorial discretion. In this case, the Department is not just neglecting to defend the law, it is using appropriated funds to directly attack it. This amendment will, hopefully, stop that, and that is why I strongly support it.
Share & report
More from José E. Serrano
Mr. Chair, I thank the gentleman from California for yielding. Mr. Chair, I recognize what my friends from Maine are attempting to do to help an important industry in their State, but I must oppose them in favor of supporting the…
There seems to have been clear attempts to bury the unbiased research and conclusions of the scientists who work for the Federal Government.
Mr. Chair, I rise in very strong support of the gentlewoman's amendment. The zero-tolerance experiment has been a tragic mistake. It has swamped U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Marshals, and district courts with low level nonviolent cases previously…
Mr. Aderholt and I may disagree again. But we are big supporters and we intend to continue to work on that together.





