Just two comments. First of all, going back to what you were discussing a moment ago, the answer to your question is that under this amendment, 40 percent of either House could hold the entire country hostage against the other 60 percent. Sixty percent could want a balanced budget and there may be a necessity for an increase in the debt ceiling, but 40 percent could say no. Forty percent could hold the country hostage as we saw the country was held hostage this year. With this, it would be much easier to hold the country hostage because the minority, not a small minority, but 40 percent could do it. Secondly, if the gentleman's answer is correct that the courts would exercise judicial restraint and not make decisions on tax increases or revenue or spending cuts, then there's no point to this whole amendment because you're saying it's unenforceable. Either the amendment is enforced by action of the court or it's not enforced. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentleman from Michigan has again expired.
On the recordNovember 17, 2011
Share & report
More from Jerry Nadler
Jan 16, 2025
Mr. Speaker, let's be very clear. Sexual offenses and domestic violence are serious crimes and are already grounds for deportability and inadmissibility, as they should be. Unfortunately, this bill is so poorly drafted that it would result…
May 13, 2025
They rushed this cruel bill to markup in the dead of night without even understanding what they were voting on.
Jun 22, 2025
The President’s decision to bomb Iran was grossly unconstitutional, since only Congress has the power to declare war.
Dec 12, 2024
Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 236, nays 173, not voting 22, as follows: [Roll No. 501] YEAS--236 Aderholt Aguilar Alford Allen…





