Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution (H. Res. 41) rejecting White nationalism and White supremacy. The Clerk read the title of the resolution. The text of the resolution is as follows: H. Res. 41 Whereas, on January 10, 2019, Representative Steve King was quoted as asking, ``White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization--how did that language become offensive?''; Whereas a 2006 Federal Bureau of Intelligence (FBI) assessment defined a White supremacist as follows: ``White supremacists believe that the white race is superior to all other races and was created to rule them. They view non- whites as subhuman and usually refer to them in derogatory terms''; Whereas the same 2006 FBI intelligence assessment defined a White nationalist as follows: ``To be a white nationalist is to be pro-white. The domestic white nationalist movement seeks to promote, honor, and defend the white race. They believe the white race is under attack from Jewish interests that dominate the government (referred to as the Zionist Occupied Government, or ZOG), the media, banking, and entertainment industries and act to the detriment of the white race. White nationalists view multiculturalism, diversity, and illegal immigration as direct assaults on the white race and race-mixing as akin to white genocide. They hope to appeal to mainstream whites, believing that the majority of white people do not understand the imminent or long-term threat to their race.…
Share & report
More from Jerry Nadler
Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 208, nays 196, not voting 28, as follows…
Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Johnson), the distinguished gentleman and ranking member of the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
Mr. Speaker, first of all, I ask unanimous consent to include in the Record a letter from more than 250 organizations representing workers, consumers, and the environment opposing H.R. 115. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to…
A nonbinding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…





