On the recordJune 12, 2013
I thank my colleague. Reclaiming the floor for a brief minute, I know my colleague from Utah has been offered time to speak on his proposal, so I don't want to take too much more time. I wish to say once again that we welcome suggestions. The Senator from Arizona is right. We carefully looked at the border. This wasn't fly-by-night. Every one of us, certainly not only myself, wants to see that border as secure as possible. It so happens that 6,500 more Border Patrol agents, if you asked the experts, they wouldn't know what to do with them. Large sections of the border have no roads, have no way to station Border Patrol agents there; whereas, helicopters, drones, and mobile forces work. It was my colleague from Arizona who actually taught me that on a trip to the border. He used his military expertise to help us figure out the most effective way to seal the border effectively. When I hear of the amendment from my colleague from Texas, I don't get what the logic is behind it, frankly. I certainly don't get the logic on his trigger. It is fair if we want to make sure the border is secure, but if we use triggers--as some might, and I am not saying that my colleague from Texas intended that--but if triggers become a way to avoid a path to citizenship--without saying directly I want to avoid a path to citizenship because I don't want to vote for it--that is not going to work and we will not move forward.…





