Political Quotes

On the recordNovember 30, 2017
A longer probationary period for new Federal hires is important to give supervisors the time they need to evaluate whether a new hire should gain career employee status. But a longer probationary period will not accomplish anything if supervisors don't use the extended time properly. Managers often don't know the end dates for probationary employees under their supervision. Because probationary periods end automatically, without action by a supervisor, an employee can be hired without a complete assessment of whether the employee is qualified for full Federal service. A 2015 Government Accountability Office report recommended automated systems to notify supervisors when the end of an individual's probationary period is imminent. {time} 1600 Agencies have these systems. They just need to use them. My amendment requires supervisors to be notified at a series of regular intervals in advance of the expiration of a probationary period. The notifications occur at 1 year, 6 months, 3 months, and 30 days before the scheduled completion of a probationary period. This notification will remind supervisors of their responsibilities to observe employees and provide feedback throughout the probationary period. It will also remind supervisors to decide whether the employee is fit for Federal service. Mr. Chairman, I urge Members to support this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Said by
Greg Gianforte
Republican · Montana

Share

More from Greg Gianforte

Oct 8, 2025

a promise to our dedicated civil servants, both those forced to the sidelines and those still hard at work without pay.

msnbc.com
Sep 19, 2022

I am proud to lend my voice to the Native American victims that I was elected to represent.

congress.gov
Jul 10, 2026

The State of Montana expects officials, both elected and appointed, to serve the people of Montana and work collaboratively with all state employees with dignity and respect.

dailymontanan.com
Jun 26, 2026

I had anticipated, in accordance with land board past practice, that we would first submit the proposal to public scoping before voting on it. It was first posted a week ago, and I don’t believe that that is sufficient time to allow…

dailymontanan.com

Other voices in this conversation