Madam Chair, I rise in opposition to the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Michigan. Not only is this amendment problematic, but as drafted, it is also unenforceable. Nowhere in Federal law is the term ``junk fees'' defined--not in our securities laws and not in this amendment. I know the Biden administration's financial regulators like to create new terms to advance the President's political agenda, but we shouldn't be making up new terms without defining them here in Congress. The companies impacted by this amendment would be equally in the dark. How can a company know if a given fee is so-called junk when neither the SEC nor the amendment can define it? Should they just charge no fees at all, potentially putting some firm out of business? The only fees Democrats seem to want to spare from this political crusade are those charged by the government itself. For example, the IRS charges fees to folks who pay their taxes late. I get it. No one wants to pay fees, but charging fees for a product or service is a normal part of doing business. Madam Chair, I urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
On the recordMarch 8, 2024
Share & report
More from Ann Wagner
Mar 8, 2024
Madam Chair, I claim the time in opposition as I am opposed to this amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Missouri is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mar 19, 2024
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 6306) to amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to prohibit the acquisition or lease of a consular or diplomatic post built or owned by an entity…
Mar 6, 2024
Madam Chair, I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Add at the end the following: DIVISION D--INCREASING INVESTOR OPPORTUNITIES SEC. 4001…
Mar 19, 2024
Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mills), the author of this bill.





