Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 21, 2012
Well, through the Chairman, I accept the comments of the gentleman from Georgia. I assume that his response to my question earlier is still ``yes.'' If that is the case, then all I can say is that I think there are very few people in the Federal legislature or among our citizenry who would say that there should not be an unlimited amount of recovery. The gentleman must have some feeling for the fact that $250,000 for the rest of the person's life, if they lose arms or legs, eyes, it's just unacceptable. I won't say that it's immoral, but it's unfair. It's my hope that most of our colleagues, as we continue this debate tomorrow, will realize that that is the fatal flaw in a bill that may have some justification in other parts of it, but that limitation of damages cannot be rationalized nor justified by the collective body of this legislature. For that reason, sir, I am urging all of our colleagues to consider this one point that I make tonight, as I close, as to be controlling in their decision that they will make as we vote tomorrow on this bill. I thank all of the Members that have joined in this debate this evening. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Said by
John Conyers
Democratic · Michigan
Source
govinfo.gov
Mar 21, 2012

Share

More from John Conyers

Nov 13, 2017

you cannot keep us in the dark forever.

congress.gov
Mar 11, 2019

Yes, they tell me there is a chance it could very well be struck down. But we will go ahead and run that risk.

congress.gov
Jul 26, 2017

We should of course remain vigilant about pay-for-delay schemes, whereby branded drug manufacturers pay generic manufacturers to delay the entry of a version of branded drugs as the patent on the branded drug expires.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation