My amendment would exempt from H.R. 5982 the rules issued in response to an imminent threat to health, safety, or other emergencies. My amendment addresses one of the most problematic aspects of H.R. 5982 which would permit Congress to invalidate rules en bloc without proper consideration of any individual rule's benefits and no matter how important or time-sensitive such rule may be. Agencies often promulgate emergency rules in response to immediate threats to public health and safety. As the Congressional Review Act itself recognizes, such critical rules can go into effect immediately if the President so directs by executive order. H.R. 5982 would, however, empower a subsequent Congress and administration to override such determination and disapprove these rules. As a result of such disapproval, these regulations would be null and void, as if they had never taken effect. It is no secret that industry and special interests have strenuously opposed many life-saving requirements that the Federal Government has imposed over the years, such as air quality standards, the mandatory installation of automobile airbags, and emergency exit lighting for passenger airplanes. Nevertheless, H.R. 5982 provides an open invitation for industry to have yet another bite of the apple by seeking to undo regulations in a new Congress and administration. For example, let us consider the Flint water crisis in my State, which was a preventable public health disaster.…
Share & report
More from John Conyers
I've been here a while and it's hard for me to recall a time when we've voted on something so obviously and willfully harmful to children, seniors and working Americans. This bill strips healthcare from 24 million people. It requires some…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Michigan will be postponed. Amendment No. 7 Offered by Mr. Johnson of Georgia The Acting…
I am pleased to yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Johnson), a distinguished member of the Judiciary Committee.
I am pleased to yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Nadler), the senior member of the House Committee on the Judiciary.





