Well, we cannot stand by while innocent civilians are murdered by chemical weapons. It's important to send a message that this behavior is not acceptable. And so the initial military action is OK. But the question that we all have to ask now is, what's next? What is the end game? Where is this all headed? Those are the questions we're asking tonight.
Moulton discusses the necessity of responding to chemical attacks and questions the future strategy in Syria.
Share & report
More from Seth Moulton
This bill is truly bipartisan. And my colleague, Chairman Nehls, has been a wonderful partner.
It's pretty clear that they did not. I mean, Trump and Hegseth literally appeared to be negotiating on behalf of Putin. They're trying to sell us on the things the Kremlin wants, and it is everything wrong with running a good negotiation.
If every wheel on a freight train had a temperature sensor like that that transmitted directly to the locomotive engineer to detect any unexplained rise in temperature, would that make trains safer?
This is the kind of innovation included in this bill. This is innovation that will make railroads safer, that will move this industry forward, that will make them more competitive.
Other voices in this conversation
