Political Quotes

On the recordDecember 16, 2010
I am standing in opposition to this proposal. When we debated the middle income tax cut a few weeks ago, I spoke in favor of a tax system that we might design for the future, a progressive system with substantial tax relief for working families, and, in our own Democratic caucus, suggested that the number $250,000 was too low; that if we raised that ceiling to $500,000, we could take care of every S corporation, we could take care of every small business person who at the end of the month uses their credit card. That was rejected. But I still thought that was a reasonable compromise. Now, when my friend Mr. Camp spoke a couple of minutes ago, he delineated the clearest position of the two parties when he said he was upset that we were not paying for the extension of unemployment benefits. For years they borrowed the money for Iraq, they borrowed the money for Afghanistan, and, I challenge anybody on the other side tonight to dispute this point, they borrowed the money for the Bush tax cuts as well. Now, the reason that I stand in opposition to this proposal tonight-- because there are many good provisions in this bill, including alternative minimum tax, and I do wish the Build America Bonds program was in here--this represents a serious threat to the solvency of the Social Security system.
Said by
Rich Neal
Democratic · Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

The speaker opposes a proposal related to tax cuts and unemployment benefits, citing concerns over Social Security solvency.

Share

More from Rich Neal

Jul 30, 2025

Republicans’ ultimate goal is to privatize Social Security, and there isn’t a backdoor they won’t try to make Wall Street’s dream a reality.

cnn.com
Jun 3, 2024

The choice is yours. If you got a better idea, put it out there.

congress.gov
Apr 10, 2024

The tax code is about values, in my belief, and you can do it in a way that supports working people or not.

congress.gov
Apr 10, 2024

It didn't pay for itself, it didn't increase revenue, and it certainly did not increase wages.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation