this is a very important amendment, and it is something that our delegation has actually been working on for quite some time, and we have actually passed it before in the Senate, which is a happy circumstance. This language has been unfortunately taken out in conference on several occasions by the Corps of Engineers, so I am thinking now that this disaster has maybe helped them to rethink the worthiness of this amendment, because, again, it doesn't add any money to the Federal budget. This amendment will allow beneficial use of dredged material, so when the Corps of Engineers spends the $170 million we give it every year to dredge our channels, to keep our navigation channels open, they can take that dredged material and use it for a beneficial use. That might be restoring a marsh. It might be building a levee, and it might be stopping oil from hitting the coastline, which would be a very good use, in my mind, of that beneficial dredge material.
On the recordMay 25, 2010
Editor's note · Context
Landrieu discusses an amendment related to the beneficial use of dredged material by the Corps of Engineers.
Share
More from Mary Landrieu
Nov 18, 2014
The Senator from North Dakota can do his closing and then I will yield to the Senator from California. Would that be OK?
Nov 18, 2014
how much time do the Republican proponents have remaining? The PRESIDING OFFICER. They have 52 minutes remaining.
Nov 13, 2014
I ask unanimous consent for 5 more minutes. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? Without objection, it is so ordered.
Nov 18, 2014
I thank the Presiding Officer. First of all, let me associate myself with the remarks of my cosponsor, Senator Hoeven, who before he had to slip out the door to take a call relative to this vote was really very clear on so many important…





