Mr. President, I come to the floor to strongly urge my colleagues, Democrats and Republicans, to oppose cloture on the so- called DREAM Act. That will be one of our votes in a few minutes. All these votes are important. That is the most important. The reasons we should oppose cloture are simple and basic. They all go to this past election. They all ask the question: Have we been listening at all to the American people? The American people have been speaking loudly and clearly on issues that pertain to the DREAM Act. I point to three in particular. No. 1, the DREAM Act is a major amnesty provision. There are no two ways about it. It grants at least 2.1 million illegals amnesty. It puts them on a path toward citizenship, which will also allow them to have their family members put in legal status. That means when we count all those people, there are probably two to three times that initial 2.1 million people who will be granted some form of amnesty. When we are not securing our borders adequately, when we are not putting a system in place to enforce workplace security, that is absolutely wrong. No. 2, we are in the middle of a serious recession. The American people are hurting. Things such as slots at public colleges and universities, things such as financial aid for those positions are very scarce and very sought after, more than ever before, because of the horrible state of the economy.…
Share & report
More from David Vitter
I also want to thank Chairman Vitter, Senator Booker, and the members of the Committee for your passion and persistence on behalf of the survivors of Superstorm Sandy.
It has become much more challenging for the owner of a small firm to shift his or her time and energy and money away from growing a business in order to comply with over-demanding regulations, particularly those that have increased under…
This notion that Secretary Kerry is meeting with these foreign banks for informational purposes, when calls come into the State Department about what different treaty obligations are and what they mean, are all those calls put through to…
When TSCA was first enacted in 1976, the Act created a higher level of judicial review for certain rulemakings that would restrict chemicals in commerce. Congress took this approach because it wanted to ensure that rulemakings that would…





