On the recordSeptember 18, 2013
I believe that it is intellectually dishonest to believe that the Federal Government would not and should not step in following another large-scale terrorist attack.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Foster argues for the necessity of federal involvement in terrorism risk insurance.
Share & report
More from Martin Foster
Nov 28, 2023
You as public officials, it is becoming very easy to clone all of your voices because once it is in the public domain, there is a data set to be able to duplicate it.
Sep 13, 2023
My time has expired, but I would hope that some of the political people at the White House would inform the Fed that they don't want a recession right before an election.
Nov 28, 2023
As the ranking member pointed out, over 82 percent of Americans and 77 percent of Republicans support the mission of the CFPB.
Oct 24, 2023
I am a physicist, and I have spent I don't know how many hours getting classified briefings on the breakout time for Iran under that deal, and it was my opinion, as a physicist who understands this technology, that it was an incredible blunder by the previous Administration to tear up the JCPOA.
Other voices in this conversation
