On the recordDecember 13, 2011
Mr. President, there are very few things on which Members of Congress agree, but one of the things that binds us and unites us is the common oath we take to uphold and defend this document. This document is not just another resolution, another law; it is the Constitution of the United States. For more than 220 years this document has guided our Nation and inspired other nations toward democracy. I think it is fitting that we swear an oath to uphold and defend it. But I think we also have to look at this document not just with respect but with humility, humility because we know the words contained have managed to guide our Nation so successfully for so many decades and centuries. Those who are bold enough to suggest they would change the wording of this document have to expect to have hard questions asked as to whether it is appropriate and whether what they are setting out to do is consistent with this great document and the needs of our Nation. I can recall when Senator Hatch chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee and I was a member. There was a day when they asked me, as a member of the Judiciary Committee, to give permission for three constitutional amendments to be considered in the same day. I objected, which was my right. I said to Chairman Hatch at the time: You can call two constitutional amendments on Thursday but, call me old-fashioned, I don't think we ought to amend the Constitution more than twice a day.…
Source
govinfo.gov




