I would respond by saying Justice O'Connor in that decision said: [A]s critical as the Government's interest may be in detaining those who actually pose an immediate threat to the national security of the United States during ongoing international conflict, history and common sense teach us that an unchecked system of detention carries the potential to become a means for oppression and abuse of others who do not present that sort of threat. . . . We therefore hold that a citizen-detainee, seeking to challenge his classification as enemy combatant, must receive notification of the factual basis for his classification, and a fair opportunity to rebut the Government's factual assertions before a neutral decisionmaker.
Share & report
More from Dick Durbin
I announce that the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) is necessarily absent. The result was announced--yeas 60, nays 37, as follows: [Rollcall Vote No. 202 Ex.] YEAS--60 Banks Blackburn Boozman Britt Budd Capito Cassidy Collins Cornyn…
I announce that the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) is necessarily absent. The yeas and nays resulted--yeas 51, nays 46, as follows: [Rollcall Vote No. 208 Leg.] YEAS--51 Banks Barrasso Blackburn Boozman Britt Budd Capito Cassidy…
Mr. President, I have come to the Senate floor before to talk about my connections with the country of Lithuania, where my mother was born. She came to the United States as an immigrant at the age of 2. It has been my good fortune to visit…
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be printed in the Record. There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows: S. 1469 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of…





