If the proposed federal rule change had been in place, and households above 130% FPL in gross income or above 100% FPL in net income who were not receiving substantial and ongoing TANF benefits had not been eligible, then Wisconsin would have received $920,832 less in federal SNAP benefits.
Ted Yoho: “If the proposed federal rule change had been in place, and households above 130% FPL in gross income or above 100% FPL…”
Editor's note · Context
Yoho discusses the financial impact of proposed changes to SNAP eligibility in Wisconsin.
Share
More from Ted Yoho
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, a country as ours, a constitutional republic, requires a citizenry that is well-educated and are responsible. I questioned a colleague of mine from New York about her policies calling for…
In closing, I want to thank the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Deutch) and the gentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Wilson) for their leadership in introducing this bill, which I support. Mr. Speaker, I urge all Members to support this…
If we are going to allow them to broadcast in this country because we do have a First Amendment, there has to be a certain amount of reciprocity.
But this is not a new issue. This is something that is--you know, we have looked at this and as I hear all the testimoneys, we look at our foreign policy, we can look back 20, 30, 40 years and those policies go to good governance…





