The accredited investor framework is in need of improvement. Today, millions of families can be targeted to invest in high-risk, illiquid, nontransparent financial products solely because of the inflated value of their assets, putting at risk their ability to live comfortably in retirement. At the same time, others who are knowledgeable are prevented from investing. When the accredited investor framework was first established by the SEC in 1982, less than 2 percent of our population could be solicited by broker-dealers or companies raising capital on the basis of their income or on the basis of their assets. Today, that has risen to 20 percent. That is not because investors are more knowledgeable and it is really not because there are more investors who can afford to take major losses. It is simply because we have had a lot of inflation since 1982, and so you can meet the asset requirements with real estate and your retirement nest egg. To be clear, no one thinks that the amount you need for your retirement in 2023 is the amount you needed in 1982. That is why the SEC needs to revise the thresholds to better protect working families. That said, Mr. Hill's bill is sensible. It would return to the original concept of the accredited investor, focusing on investors who are knowledgeable about the risks of private securities.…
Share & report
More from Wendy Sherman
Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 6. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Steube). The question is on passage of the bill. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that the ayes appeared to have it.
The one person that may be most surprised by us going out of order is the author of this bill, Mr. Gottheimer. I know he is on his way now to this floor, so in order for him to get here before he would have expected to be needed, I will…
Let me respond to those comments. The underlying bill acknowledges the fact that the government puts some restrictions on how much of your net worth you can put into one of these unregulated, risky, low-information, illiquid investments…
My pro-Israel efforts began long before my 28 years on the Foreign Affairs Committee, and I believe that my pro- Israel record is as long and as strong as any Member of this House. I rise to oppose this pseudo pro-Israel bill. It purports…





