I thank the gentleman from Florida. We're in an unusual situation here where the same people on the other side of the aisle who decry the regulation of what insurance providers have to provide to those they insure across State borders and who want to interfere with our requirement that insurance companies not be allowed to discriminate based on preexisting conditions, on the other hand they say we need to replace the State tort systems, all 50 of them, with one overarching Federal approach with regard to malpractice. So whereas there is no Federal role in protecting patients from being dropped by their insurers, from preventing insurance companies from excluding individuals because they had childhood asthma, because they're a breast cancer survivor, and in many cases even because they have a child, while there is no Federal role for that, somehow there is a Federal role in micromanaging the way in which somebody who was wrongfully injured by a botched procedure can seek recourse. I ask my colleagues, not only where is the consistency, but how can we reconcile this with our values as Americans?
Share & report
More from Jared Polis
Today I rise in memory of my colleague, Louise McIntosh Slaughter. For my entire time of service in the House of Representatives, she was my ranking member of the Rules Committee. I sat just a couple of seats down from somebody who truly…
I was absent for the vote on passage of H.R. 5895 (rollcall No. 257), but had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on final passage. personal explanation
``Immigrant children,'' quoting from this article, ``are being routinely and forcibly given a range of psychotropic drugs at U.S. government-funded youth shelters.'' Taking multiple psychotropic drugs can seriously injure children. And…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, the Chair will reduce to 5 minutes the minimum time for any electronic vote on the question of adoption of the…





