Mr. Speaker, in July, the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources heard all about how royalties, if ill-constructed, serve only to disincentivize investment in self-sufficiency and increase our reliance on imported critical minerals. This amendment is a hallmark example of such a poorly designed royalty. This amendment doesn't specify what the royalty will be applied to, when in the mining process it will be assessed, and it doesn't even have a cap, for that matter. This amendment is just a thinly veiled means to prevent this important mining project from getting off the ground. The author actually stated that in his comments. Mr. Speaker, I oppose this amendment. I ask all Members to vote against it, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Paul Gosar
Madam Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this amendment. This amendment includes the Grand Canyon Protection Act, falsely named legislation, which has nothing to do with the Grand Canyon and is a cover for a giant Federal land grab…
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the life of Charles Vernon Parker of Austin, Texas, known as Charlie to his friends and family. Over the last three decades, Charlie Parker has been a leader in the business community, construction…
Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of my amendment, floor amendment No. 154 of the NDAA. Currently, the United States relies on China for 20 different critical minerals, which includes several rare earth materials defined by the…
Mr. Speaker, as I was saying, the probability of these ectopic curves, you have a better likelihood of winning the Mega Millions lottery than you do having statistical issues here. Over 30,000 illegal aliens voted in Arizona using the…





