The problem right now is that such a letter, if it confirmed we were going to move forward with a missile defense system adequate to protect the United States from an ICBM, from more than regional threats, would directly contradict our signing statement.
Jon Kyl: “The problem right now is that such a letter, if it confirmed we were going to move forward with a missile defense system…”
On the recordDecember 17, 2010
Editor's note · Context
Kyl discusses the implications of a presidential letter on missile defense and treaty commitments.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
Oct 4, 2018
this is the first time I have had the opportunity to address my colleagues on the Senate floor since I was appointed to fill the seat of our late friend and colleague John McCain. I appreciate the opportunity to speak on a matter of great…
Nov 14, 2023
The best way to deter a nuclear conflict is to deter a conventional conflict with the nuclear powers.
Dec 18, 2018
I certainly appreciate this comment by the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee because the Secretaries of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs have all said our strategic deterrent has to be our No. 1 priority. Why is…





