Madam President, I, too, would like to speak to the conference report on financial regulatory reform, which we will presumably vote on in a couple of hours. I think we all agree that the purpose of financial regulatory reform should have been to tackle the problems that led to the financial crisis in the first place. That means serious reform must, at the very least, end too-big-to-fail financial institutions and rein in two government-sponsored enterprises, the GSEs, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But despite its size and the hype behind it, the bill before us fails in those two key respects. Moreover, even though Main Street did not cause the problem, the bill is so pervasive in its regulatory reach that it creates new burdens for Main Street businesses. I am not sure that is what the bill's supporters want or its authors intend, but that will be the result. For example, a July 4 Wall Street Journal news article entitled ``Finance Overall Casts Long Shadow on the Plains'' explains how new derivatives rules will harm America's livestock farmers. There are other problems with the bill. The biggest new problem it causes is the harm to the availability of credit, something our colleague, Senator Gregg from New Hampshire, has talked a lot about. It implements one-size-fits-all capital standards and uses flawed funding mechanisms. It also perpetuates bailouts, and burdens small businesses with new regulations, which I will speak about in a moment.…
Share & report
More from Jon Kyl
Mr. President, I thank the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee for engaging in this brief colloquy and for specifically calling for a hearing a couple of weeks ago at which the two cochairmen of the National Defense Strategy…
Mr. President, I certainly appreciate this comment by the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee because the Secretaries of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs have all said our strategic deterrent has to be our No. 1…
the possibility of an attack coming from one of these hypersonic weapons would be a preemptive, or out of the blue kind of attack, it could be decapitating.
The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Alexander), the Senator from Georgia (Mr. Chambliss), the Senator from South Carolina (Mr. DeMint), the Senator from Nebraska (Mr. Johanns), the Senator from…





