Political Quotes

On the recordDecember 21, 2010
Mr. President, there was no delay in the implementation of the START I agreement because of a requirement that a side agreement be entered into between the then-Soviet Union and the United States on SLCMs. So I don't buy the notion that this necessarily would delay anything. Secondly, we are not talking about tactical missile limitations generally. All we are doing is talking about the same kinds of missiles that were the subject of the side agreement under START I. I suspect that part of the reason was because it is pretty difficult to distinguish as to whether these weapons are being used for a strategic or a tactical purpose. Senator Kerry has said they cannot upset the strategic balance. I simply totally disagree with that proposition. They absolutely can upset the strategic balance, depending upon where they are located or how they intend to be used. That is one of the reasons I suspect they were limited under the START I treaty. My colleague said they can't threaten our submarine fleet at sea and they pose only a limited threat to ICBM sites. Well, that may be the opinion of our experts. They could sure threaten our submarine bases in Washington State at King's Bay. They could take out bases or other assets we have.…
Said by
Jon Kyl
Republican · Arizona

Share & report

More from Jon Kyl

Nov 14, 2023

What it shows first of all, that it's kind of the microcosm for the macrocosm.

congress.gov
Oct 9, 2018

The responsibilities between the three of you are enormous, and they relate everything to our country's national security.

congress.gov
Nov 14, 2023

SLCM-N would achieve the objective that we set out.

congress.gov
Dec 18, 2018

I couldn't agree with the chairman more. I applaud the chairman and the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee for going to the President, along with Secretary of Defense Mattis, and talking about the need to continue with his…

Congressional Record · 2018-12-18

Other voices in this conversation