I would like to speak a bit about the two competing philosophies of economic growth. The first version I will discuss is the so-called Keynesian economics, which has been the basis of the Obama administration's economic policy since January 2009 and, I would add, with little to no success in reviving our economy and reducing unemployment. Keynesian economics relies on the theory that in recessionary times, increased government spending can take the place of private sector activity, hence the administration's nearly $1 trillion stimulus package, the Cash for Clunkers Program and a litany of other government programs, transfer payments, and temporary tax credits. This administration's insistence on enacting these temporary Keynesian policies to stimulate consumption is misguided and has ultimately failed. As the Wall Street Journal editorialized in a piece called 'The Obama Economy:' Never before has government spent so much and intervened so directly in credit allocation to spur growth, yet the results have been mediocre at best. In return for adding nearly $3 trillion in Federal debt in 2 years, we still have 14.9 million people unemployed.
On the recordSeptember 20, 2010
Editor's note · Context
The speaker critiques Keynesian economics and its impact on the economy under the Obama administration.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
Nov 14, 2023
One of our recommendations concerns ways that we could potentially mitigate the risk of a deterrence gap.
Nov 14, 2023
Our responsibility is to be straightforward with you all. You're the ones that appointed us, you're the ones that we answer to.
Nov 14, 2023
The threat briefings that we received leave no question that both China and Russia, but particularly China see space as a war fighting domain.
Dec 18, 2018
I certainly appreciate this comment by the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee because the Secretaries of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs have all said our strategic deterrent has to be our No. 1 priority. Why is…





