Madam Chair, this amendment prohibits funds under this act from being used to enforce two rules under Obama's so-called Clean Power Plan. This plan was administrative overreach, plain and simple. It would have mandated the shutdown of power plants and increased energy costs for families across the country. The Clean Power Plan is just another example of Obama-era regulations killing American jobs, strangling our economy, and destroying our domestic energy industry. The proposed Clean Power Plan would have required Arizona, my State, to achieve a 52 percent reduction in the CO<INF>2</INF> emissions rate for affected power plants and to achieve about 90 percent of that reduction by next year, 2020. That was totally unrealistic. Arizona has Palo Verde nuclear plant. It is the largest producing nuclear plant in the entire Nation. Often Arizona produces more energy than it consumes, and so we sell our energy and our electricity throughout the Southwest. So Arizona energy is American energy. The regulations that strangle Arizona power generating stations harm American consumers well beyond our borders. I applaud the Trump administration for recognizing the harm of the Clean Power Plan and repealing and replacing it with the Affordable Clean Energy rule.
Share & report
More from Debbie Lesko
Madam Speaker, I rise today to recognize someone whose lifelong service to our Nation has been a blessing to me and countless others, Matthew Simon. Welcome to the House gallery, Matt. I am so glad you are here. Through his time teaching…
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize someone whose service has been instrumental in the lives of constituents in Arizona's Eighth Congressional District, Tyler Mastin. Tyler's service to the Eighth District began in August of 2022 as a…
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize my son, Jared Lesko. As you know, I will be retiring from Congress this year, so I want to make sure I talk about the people important to me, including my son, Jared Lesko. Jared is my youngest child…
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 6192 The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentlewoman…





