There is no doubt we need infrastructure funding in this country. Too bad we couldn't have taken this bill through committee and debated that. But oh what a tangled web we weave when we practice first to deceive. Mr. Speaker, my, my, what a tangled web of deceit House Democrats have woven, with this bill as only one of the threads. Let's take a brief look at a couple of the biggest lies that are spun in this dangerous web. The first lie is that this is a bipartisan infrastructure bill. This bill is not bipartisan, and Democrats know it. You can't have a bipartisan House bill that didn't go through committee that will not go to conference and has no Republican amendments. If you want a bipartisan bill, then stop the deceit. Pull this bill, send it to committee, and let's go through the bipartisan process. The second lie is that this is an infrastructure bill. Mr. Speaker, a half truth is a lie, and saying this is an infrastructure bill is like saying that a hurricane is a rain shower. There are rain showers in a hurricane, but there is so much more, just like there is some infrastructure in this bill, but there is so much more. In fact, this $1.2 trillion bill is just a down payment on the $5.5 trillion package that looks like it was developed at a socialist symposium on taxing and spending. It is deceitful to say that this is a $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill. It is only the beginning, and it is intricately linked to trillions more.…
Share
More from Bruce Westerman
Our friends across the aisle want to talk about being serious, but when we marked up this legislation in committee, here are some of the serious amendments that they put out. Number one, they wanted to rename it not the Gulf of America…
I left out one of the other amendments my colleagues across the aisle filed. They wanted to rename the Gulf the gulf of ignorance. Now, I don't know where they came up with that one. I know they oppose offshore oil and gas production. I…
The Endangered Species Act has consistently failed to achieve its intended goals and has been warped by decades of radical environmental litigation into a weapon instead of a tool.
I ask that all Members be given 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and to include extraneous material on H.R. 375, the bill now under consideration. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the…





