
tough talk is fine, but Vladimir Putin really responds to only one thing, action.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
14,200+·quotes on file

tough talk is fine, but Vladimir Putin really responds to only one thing, action.

Mr. President, I would like to start by thanking Senator Mikulski for organizing us today and much more importantly for her leadership over the years on this issue. We are so proud to have her as our dean. I come to the floor today on…

Is there any circumstance that you would prosecute a member of the Administration for lying under oath to Congress?

would it not be pointless for Congress to pass new laws limiting data collection if the Justice Department is at liberty and other officials are at liberty to lie about enforcing them?

Well, Director Clapper has admitted that he has lied, and I outlined the elements to convict someone of perjury.

Mr. Clapper said, "No, sir, not wittingly."

Madam Speaker, if it is Thursday, it is throw-back Thursday. I want to take a look back to April 15, 2011, the House Republicans passed a budget that balanced. March 29, 2012, House Republicans led the charge to pass a budget that…

Mr. President, when my grandparents were raising me, I learned that if you work hard and play by the rules, you should be able to get ahead. As I traveled throughout the State of Wisconsin meeting with Wisconsinites I know that my fellow…

I want to reiterate the apology that was contained in Secretary de Vallance's letter.

But today is a hearing about discrimination at the CFPB, and I want to focus on the allegations that have been made specifically about the CFPB.

For me, that tells me the problem still exists. They are not embracing what you are sharing.

I am disappointed that you have given the CFPB an opportunity to change its ways, to actually see that a problem exists and that they have a chance to change course.

I want to be clear about our willingness to work with you to make sure that they are accountable for what has happened.

And the only reason anybody would make sure in a total quality management system that a part number didn't change would be to hide the fact that that part changed for some reason, correct?

That is really just a total violation of a total quality management system, correct?

So if there is a problem, there is a defect in the manufacturing process, you can trace back exactly where that happened.

But it is going to be pretty important to find out who was responsible for overriding the quality system to change that part.