
This morning we will look at two pieces of legislation that represent a much-needed and important paradigm shift in federal lands policy.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
8,900+·quotes on file

This morning we will look at two pieces of legislation that represent a much-needed and important paradigm shift in federal lands policy.

I continue to work with Rep. Walden, Rep. Schrader, the Governor, and the Oregon Delegation on many outstanding details.

It would save the federal government money and provide a net benefit to the American taxpayer.

So it is true that they had close to 80 percent of the territory and that was a funding mechanism for the Federal Government.

I support the Committee's goal to expedite the environmental review process.

Counties are united in their desire to move away from direct annual SRS payments.

Thank you for the opportunity to testify this morning.

the United States is in breach of its agreement.

Congress' breach of Utah's enabling act is choking off that needed funding.

As was indicated by my colleague here, at one time, 80 percent of America was owned by the Federal Government.

Antitrust enforcement can and should play a role.

I'm a firm believer in the free market. I'm also an almost life-long fan of Robert Bork.

this practice seems to me to leverage Google's primary search dominance to give its own secondary services and listings an unnatural and an extraordinary advantage.

Internet search is critical to economic growth in the United States and Google has long been a dominant force in this arena.

my real interest as a free market conservative Republican is in seeing that actors like Google take voluntary action so that there's no need for antitrust enforcement in the first place

We learned from Robert Bork that the animating principle of antitrust justice ought to be consumer welfare.

The right answer is appropriate antitrust enforcement.