But one of the things we need to do is make sure that that information that may currently reside in the day-to-day prudential regulator actually would get pushed up and actually shared.

It might force some of our banks to move quicker into which assets they might be willing to dispose of.

There is a great deal of interest in taking on the comprehensive.

I would love to see their sense of whether expedited on that would make some sense.

I would like to go back, on my own remaining time, to the notion that the Chairman raised in terms of systemic risk.

We all have been waiting for some time for the release of the so-called stress test results.

I can assure you that not only will Dan bring great professional credentials to this very important position, but also great personal characteristics as well.

I think Dan will be a great addition to the administration.

Our farmers see the government stepping in, spending $1.5 billion on this, however serious it may be.

It's not necessarily best practices that we would define if we were looking at this from a different viewpoint in terms of putting armed security people on these ships.

Well, a defensive action of some sort emanating from the target has an impact on the people trying to take the target.

I understand that if we were to put embarked military security on ships at certain points that there's a wider group of international associations that would be comfortable with that, but that's not what I'm talking about.

I am delighted to be here to introduce my good friend, Dan Poneman.

To me, it makes a tremendous amount of sense to get small groups of highly trained people to work in a synergistic fashion with the military.

Hopefully, we'll come to a conclusion on that sometime in the next 10 days.

I think there's going to be a more militarily oriented hearing next week on this as well.

I mean, this is not that old when Captain Phillips saved the Alabama.

We're obviously concerned about that, but principally concerned about American shipping.