I would support the idea of having a continuing independent strategic review panel.

Getting those resources back invested in our economy, would be a great value.

There are a host of other things, R&D tax credit, other issues out there.

If you and your colleagues were going to enact an extension anyway, than it is not as incremental as...

I concur with my colleague from Nevada on streamlining.

The goal stated by the Navy is 313. I think you were talking 346.

The issue for us is how we communicate our national interests to the rest of the world.

I think, with China stating that the South China Sea areas in terms of sovereignty are a core interest...

It is shame. They shouldn't both exist.

I think Senator Warner would agree with that.

Let me make one comment, and I want to get to one question for Commissioner Casey.

It is hard to have a conversation about international insolvency internationally without the term 'Lehman' recurring through the conversation.

getting that trigger right so it doesn't become a self-fulfilling prophecy that that action means the firm is going down.

I don't think we by any means have come close to dealing with the too big to fail issue.

The challenge as we kind of, and I am by no means an expert on domestic bankruptcy, let alone international bankruptcy, but the difference between how a bankruptcy fence goes in international countries is something that we clearly need.

I still have grave concerns about the investments around high-frequency trading, that it is not just all about liquidity.

I agree with Senator Corker that a lot of this bill was turning over to the regulators to try to figure things out.

I think the jury is going to be out based upon how well they are implemented both domestically and internationally.