I'd like to know. I mean, that's the NOAA job.
I believe that we must--that we're the research and the funding for research, because whatever we do, I'm going to be su...
So you said in moderation. And I'm going to ask you to submit for the record what additional research you think needs to...
But we should not say no, you may not use any dispersant, because, at the time, we were risking that which we've all see...
I'm not being critical of you and I'm not--we're looking at public policy areas where we need to really tighten up so we...
It's time now to really conclude the hearing, and we thank you for your generosity of time.
I'm going to either ban or limit the use of dispersants, could you have the power to act unilaterally?
We look forward to looking at that legislation and perhaps being joined as an early cosponsor with you.
when Administrator Jackson asked BP to please look into the use of a different kind of dispersant, she was essentially b...
There's a continuum of actions here. One is an outright ban. That, I think, has to be well founded on solid research.
And I presume they're scientific advisors to you.
And then who certifies the States in terms of a level of competency to test for this?
So if that is the case and we're losing that much oil that quickly, we have to be concerned about any opportunity to red...
The oil producing act won't let you find out what another country does.
The UK, as I understand it, banned dispersants. That gave me pause.
Better information is needed to determine the window of opportunity and percentage effectiveness of dispersant applicati...
We need to know that seafood is safe, and the American public needs to know that seafood is safe for the simple reason t...
Our No. 1 concern is the safety of the American people, safety of the air they breathe, and the food they eat.
