But I don't believe so.
Every Member has that personal responsibility. And they do it under oath.
the rules sometimes yield more nearly the opposite of their intended result, expensive and painfully slow litigation tha...
After Justice Scalia's death, Senate Republicans decided to let the American people in this last Presidential election c...
If our pronouncements of constitutional law rely primarily on value judgments, then a free and intelligent people's atti...
The judiciary may truly be said to have neither force nor will, but merely judgment.
That judges should strive to apply the law as it is, not to decide cases based on their own moral convictions or the pol...
You do believe the Fourteenth Amendment applies to all persons, right?
I hope you really will take a look at cameras in the courtroom.
hostility to religious expression in the public square
I firmly believe the Supreme Court has lost its way in limiting religious expression in this country.
I was part of the Senate Judiciary Committee, a number of us were, when we voted to reaffirm the Voting Rights Act.
The idea that agencies, unelected bureaucrats, have the latitude to interpret their own legal authorities... is a troubl...
The Supreme Court of the United States has made that very clear.
If we see something we think is an injustice or is wrong, it is within our authority to change it as elected representat...
if people are going to cherry-pick a judge's decisions, and to characterize them as caring or not caring about children ...
it strikes me that this is kind of an indictment of the whole Federal judicial system.
That is precisely what we should expect of judges.
