I think all fair-minded Americans hold that the President will emerge from this process exonerated and able to renew his effective service.
I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr.
I believe that she does not lose jurisdiction to investigate and recommend the prosecution or hold criminal contempt hearings for anyone tha...
I asked, he referred to a court case which was then under seal, and I was not able to characterize his--I felt myself unable to characterize...
I think that the White House submission, although I have not read all of it, I've read part of it--the part I read did deal in great detail ...
No--well, I could compare it this way, that in the cases that have been referred to--I have not heard of any in which it is analogous to thi...
I think this panel has presented some very compelling testimony on all the pitfalls in pursuing a perjury prosecution in this situation and ...
I thank the gentleman from Wisconsin, who is the ranking Member on the Judiciary, for his explanation
could I point out to my distinguished scholars and members of the Committee on the Judiciary, we are not trying to solve this problem within...
s not a history future will view with pride. Over and over again, our Republican colleagues have called for the rule of law.
I believe you ought to look and think about what a rational, fair-minded senator would do, how he or she would vote.
I think it's sickening that the President does this.
I suggest that there are alternatives that are open to this Congress to deal with that particular issue.
I believe that the case for these Articles is not strong enough to merit sending them to the Senate for trial.
I believe the president is responsible for his own character and his own actions.
I believe the Judiciary Committee failed to live up to its solemn duty and responsibility, under the authority of H.
I think has been one of the finest debates that the House of Representatives has had.
