We need change and we need it now.
We will not truly transform the economy until we spur the private sector to action.
A cap on carbon in the U.S. will spur our companies to be the early movers in these markets.
I respectfully ask the Senate to be as bold as the House has been.
We see it absolutely as an opportunity.
A cap on greenhouse gas pollution is the surest way to create jobs for the clean economy.
We are not just looking for a handout. We are looking for a hand up.
There is no doubt of the great importance of this issue in many directions: cleaning up the environment, stopping this threat of carbon, red...
Many of us have been trying for a long time to get clean coal technology to ease that issue.
The administration's proposal, this year, is to have an increase in NIH funding of $443 million, which is totally insufficient.
My own sense is having been in the field and having the experts from the National Institutes of Health, it is an enormously impressive heari...
To what extent, Dr. Kaufman, do those royalties--how big a factor are the royalties?
I think Dr. Curran and Dr. Kaufman are modest in just wanting three and one-half-times the $30 billion. I think the yield would be greater.
the object is to promote health and if all of the eggs are in the research basket, you have the 'Valley of Death,' and there's not a practic...
I was not arguing for tripling the NIH budget, only the portion devoted to the competitive grant-review process.
It's the Kaufman review process?
NIH would like to have more money and I would like NIH to have more money.
I think Tom Curran actually said it earlier.
