As I said before, these are tough cases from the plaintiff's side, even under the old standard.
I don't think there is any question right now that we are recovering.
The unemployment situation is better than it has been, certainly better than a year ago.
The economy is growing, which is a dramatic change from a year ago or less.
I just want to clarify on the new fund you would create with $30 billion of TARP money; you are talking about using those resources to get t...
this year's funding is also disgraceful, in my opinion, at $1 billion.
$219 million doesn't give you a whole lot of visibility.
we ought to be funding NIH a lot more aggressively than we are.
Mr. Chairman, you and I have found as much as $3.77 billion, in the past.
I heard there was a lot of enthusiasm for it.
last year's funding was disgraceful, at $772 million.
Many programs fail and many programs succeed.
I would like you to go back to your office and review what could be accomplished with the $500 million.
The successes have been monumental in what you have done for prolonging and saving lives.
You've got a great case, but it hasn't been expressed very well.
the National Institutes of Health are the crown jewels of the Federal Government--perhaps the only jewels.
Is it sufficient to impose a fine? Or what kind of a fine would be big enough to be punishment?
I was not putting Goldman in the question.
