Defensive systems would inhibit and make uncertain the threat of a first strike against the United States of America.
If cheating doesn't matter, then what's the point of a treaty, Dr. Foster?
Many of us have concerns about the New START's methods of verification, its constraints on ballistic missile defense (BM...
For the next 10 years a New START treaty could trump the deployment of a Prompt Global Strike capability.
I thank our witnesses for their service and for joining us today.
This request is not unprecedented. The Senate has previously sought and received access to the negotiating history for a...
Then is it agreeable to you that this committee and the Senate have the ability to carefully review the negotiating reco...
What leverage do we have to compel Russia to discuss reductions of its tactical arsenal in the future if we were to rati...
If we offered assurances on missile defense, why didn't we demand similar assurances on tactical nuclear weapons?
some people argue that we must ratify this treaty if we ever want to engage with the Russians on reducing tactical nucle...
So you would object to this committee and members of the Senate from reviewing the full review of the negotiating record...
I think most observers agree that the verification requirements of this treaty are less stringent than START I.
The New START treaty will enhance U.S. national security by stabilizing the strategic balance between the U.S. and the R...
They are working, in 2010, on complying with treaties that were concluded many, many years ago.
So the answer is no?
Let me state unequivocally today on the record before this committee, as I have stated before the Senate Foreign Relatio...
Is that true?
We must ask why did the administration agree to this language after saying they would do no such thing?
