Defensive systems would inhibit and make uncertain the threat of a first strike against the United States of America.
I believe that a substantive assessment of the New START treaty demonstrates that the treaty is in the U.S. national int...
I don't understand why we go to the trouble of negotiating with a potential adversary with the understanding that the ad...
I view missile defense as a way of inhibiting a first-strike motivation by the part of the Russians or anybody else.
Last year, the Perry-Schlesinger Strategic Posture Commission alerted Congress to the dire need for modernizing the nucl...
a failure to ratify would carry substantial costs for the United States.
Missile defense doesn't harm anybody's deterrence, it harms the ability of countries for first strike.
there are compelling reasons for the Senate to give its consent to ratification of the New START treaty.
Mr. D'Agostino, is the fiscal year 2011 and the future years budget plan sufficient to support the fiscal year 2017 deli...
What would the consequences of denying such a request have on meeting the critical 2017 deadline?
General Chilton, the development of the dual-capable, nuclear and conventional, variant of the F-35 to replace aging dua...
under the treaty, any missile can carry any number of warheads, as long as the total does not exceed 1,550, but it's unc...
General Chilton, have you also conducted a net assessment to determine if the United States can carry out its deterrence...
is there any likelihood of the B-61 production slipping as a result of budget issues in fiscal years 2010-2012?
How critical is the timely approval of this reprogramming request?
Dr. Miller, irrespective of threats from the Russians to withdraw from the treaty, is this administration committed to f...
the 1251 report outlined a baseline nuclear force structure which specifies retaining up to 420 deployed ICBMs, a cut of...
General Chilton, have you yet estimated how the Russians will configure their strategic forces under the New START?
