I fear that there is already a gap emerging between expectations and fiscal realities.
It appears that both Russia and the United States will have the capability to upload large numbers of warheads in fairly...
Russian cheating could have significant political and strategic implications if the assumptions about the scope and timi...
Do you feel we should be concerned that this treaty may impede the development and deployment of our future prompt globa...
I share Dr. Anastasio's concerns regarding the inadequacy of the funding identified in the administrations section 1251 ...
as strategic arsenals are reduced, the distinction between tactical and strategic nuclear weapons is bound to erode.
the verification provisions of New START are inadequate to give us the depth of knowledge that we will need, given Russi...
The inadequacy of that standard alone for credible deterrence and assurance has been recognized by Democratic and Republ...
Our so-called tactical nuclear weapons in Europe provide a strategic deterrent to Russia's tactical nuclear weapons that...
Does cheating matter?
Perhaps it will be with bombers, rather than ICBMs, if they have an effective missile defense.
What leverage do we have to compel Russia to discuss reductions of its tactical arsenal in the future if we were to rati...
Then is it agreeable to you that this committee and the Senate have the ability to carefully review the negotiating reco...
This request is not unprecedented. The Senate has previously sought and received access to the negotiating history for a...
I thank our witnesses for their service and for joining us today.
For the next 10 years a New START treaty could trump the deployment of a Prompt Global Strike capability.
Many of us have concerns about the New START's methods of verification, its constraints on ballistic missile defense (BM...
If cheating doesn't matter, then what's the point of a treaty, Dr. Foster?
