The court existed primarily to fulfill this mission.
So let me start by asking you the standard for judges in approaching cases that we talked about, starting with the Presi...
It was the role of the courts in interpreting the Constitution to protect the people who went unprotected by every other...
judges should have a keen understanding of how the law affects the daily lives of the American people.
We do need more diversity on the Court.
the role of a judge is to put aside any biases or prejudices and to impartially apply the law.
There is no Federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
I think that there wouldn't be anything wrong with the Committee understanding whether or not your decision was based on...
Unfortunately the Graham Amendment would prohibit challenges to detention practices, treatment of prisoners, adjudicatio...
I absolutely disagree with you about that.
the whole point of the Court's rule is to interpret what is permitted under the Constitution
I only regret that none of my democratic colleagues except Senator Kaufman are here to be instructed in the error of the...
As to the first three, I take from the invitation to have them testify a hope that their presence argues for a justice w...
I too am baffled that upholding political speech in the First Amendment is not considered a liberal decision.
In Justice Marshall's view, constitutional interpretation demanded above all else that the courts show a special solicit...
Well, the stats are 80 percent. So that is a pretty good percentage, when you ask them to take a case and they do.
Judges should have a keen understanding of how the law affects the daily lives of the American people and know that in a...
for once on the side of the angels.
