Without a bipartisan commitment to provide adequate and sustained resources, do you believe we will be able to maintain ...
ensure that resources are commensurate with the requirements and expectations.
I understand that prior to the release of the fiscal year 2011 budget you originally requested more than a billion dolla...
If we offered assurances on missile defense, why didn't we demand similar assurances on tactical nuclear weapons?
some people argue that we must ratify this treaty if we ever want to engage with the Russians on reducing tactical nucle...
So you would object to this committee and members of the Senate from reviewing the full review of the negotiating record...
I think most observers agree that the verification requirements of this treaty are less stringent than START I.
The New START treaty will enhance U.S. national security by stabilizing the strategic balance between the U.S. and the R...
They are working, in 2010, on complying with treaties that were concluded many, many years ago.
So the answer is no?
Let me state unequivocally today on the record before this committee, as I have stated before the Senate Foreign Relatio...
Is that true?
We must ask why did the administration agree to this language after saying they would do no such thing?
Absolutely, sir.
The cost alone for modernizing both the nuclear weapons complex and the triad are substantial.
Now is the time to face up to the realities. More funding will be needed in the first few years.
The Russians are known for their secrecy, denial, and deception in operating their strategic forces.
It is critically important that the United States maintain a modern and effective ICBM force.
