I have outlined in this document a detailed set of red flags that make me very suspicious that the returns aren't real, or if they are real,...
I am very concerned about the personal safety of myself and my family as a result of this report.
I have spoken to the heads of various Wall Street equity derivative trading desks and every single one of the senior managers I spoke with t...
My concern is, and I'll wrap up with this Mr. Chairman, that the pre-9/11 set of walls has been replaced with a new set of walls preventing ...
With all due respect, Mr. Director, as I've said, you've worked very well with me. This is not what we've done over the years.
Is it fair to say then, Director, that this staged development of information, as you describe it, is in fact the new standard of proof for ...
I think that's a pretty sweeping comment that there really isn't any standard of proof, that there isn't any, to your terminology, no partic...
What I am interested in knowing is, what is necessary at this point, Director Mueller, to initiate an investigation within the FBI?
Why not require a judge to approve these National Security Letters?
I hope that Thursday's session can be done in public.
If the privacy board met the constitutional standards, what you're telling me is you would not rule out giving them a subpoena.
I want to follow up on an area that Senator Levin was touching on.
Are you aware of Doe v. Ashcroft?
We ought to be fighting terrorism ferociously without gutting civil liberties.
I'm not aware of abuses.
But what is the standard of proof, then?
I'm concerned that a lot of these recipients aren't given notice of their right to challenge search orders.
Well, again, what is hard for us to address here is that we're to some extent doing oversight in the dark.
