On the public record
All Quotes
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
28,900+·quotes on file

I think that the citizens of the State not only should be notified and have to volunteer, but the citizens of the State should vote if they want to allow this highly invasive scanning of their faces.

I'm certainly going to join in legislation to put a warrant requirement in on this.

I fully support the suggestion of Ms. Lynch--no relation--that a warrant should be required in those cases.

Wait a minute. Hold on. Where are we going here?

I think there are more questions raised than answers as to the statutory authority being cited and whether or not we need additional statutory authority to both encumber the FBI and to authorize it and to protect citizens.

Presumably, when and if that diplomatic effort needs to be launched, a planned 31 percent cut in the State Department and USAID's budget would not really be helpful.

there is a huge opportunity cost too. So, in addition to throwing good money after bad potentially--I'm talking about by leaving waste unaddressed, this waste--we're also taking away from civilian domestic investments that are all so…

Why in the world would we want to add $54 billion to the Pentagon's budget this year when we haven't addressed the critical issue of efficiency?

Beginning in 2015, General Dunford, as the head of the Joint Chiefs, in appearances before this committee started to say and he said on multiple occasions now that among nation-states in the world, Russia is our biggest--he has used the…

I do want to reiterate my sincere disappointment and really shock that there is so much at stake for patients and families in the bill working its way through the House now.

This is a humanitarian catastrophe that is about to happen.

This committee will have nothing to say about it.

Twenty-four million people are about to lose their healthcare.

We are pretending like the debate does not exist.

If we are going to fix it, should we fix it fast, careless, and secret? Or, should we fix it slowly, deliberately, and transparently?

The notion of taking an action on a bill that might cause 24 million people to lose health insurance does not do credit to a body that is often called the world's greatest deliberative body.

Would a budget cut of that size to the NIH hurt the innovation that is one of the subjects of this hearing?