I guess I would like to know what are the offsets, when are we going to see the cost benefit analysis, when are we going to see the policy c...
Right. Well, I am well aware of that, and that is why we are concerned about 18 months versus the predictability of six years and enhanced i...
They cannot commit themselves to something for which they cannot reasonably guarantee or foresee revenues.
Okay. Well, so we are basically waiting, and you guys have some big plans, but we don't know about them, and it has got to be done basically...
Yes, but the point is uncertainty. Okay, thank you. I don't think you have answered it.
How is the State going to plan a two or three year major project if they are only guaranteed 18 months of funding?
I am a bit puzzled about the 18-month proposal.
We just had a law change regarding the Recovery Act signed by the President yesterday that may serve to retain even more jobs.
I am proposing a very simple revenue issue and I gave it to Chief of Staff this morning.
the measures are not being followed.
Well, 450 is trust funded or General Fund into transit. Of that, because of the way scoring and outlays work, we need to raise an additional...
I can't agree with you that what the President is proposing is more of the Bush era policy.
we figure we can go from 14 years average delivery on a major transit project to maybe 3 under our proposal.
I voted against the balanced budget agreement because I didn't think it was real. And I am sorry that the Republicans gave back all the savi...
I would like to praise the plan that you put forward, and three things that I had been advocating for were in the plan.
I will try to dive into it a little more and follow up with your team, and thank you very much.
I think I have a ways to go to see the Fed as the right place to set capital adequacy rules.
Fifteen percent unemployment, lost a lot of family wage jobs.
