Can I go to the pesticide issue and what breakthroughs we might be making in pesticides?
And I find that in general as kind of a rule, there are some people, they have some disease, you know, they're telling e...
They're there as a section of the law, and they're acting under that section of law, so it's not a rewriting of the laws...
Now, the daughter or the mother, they know that they went to the religious website, so they know what they're doing.
Well, again, I would leave it up to the same lawyers at the FCC that were just upheld at the Circuit Court to determine ...
What they're talking about is giving consumers more power to choose if their sensitive information can be used or shared...
where you go online all day long is as sensitive as your health information.
There's kind of an argument here, well, this is kind of like a radical departure from what's been going on for the last ...
If that information is not considered to be sensitive, then all of us have every bit of information being gathered about...
the telephone company can't sell that information, where you went, who you are.
It's a modest set of requirements.
Basically, what that is is an opt-out provision for a constitutional right.
It's reasonable. It gives the consumer some rights, some sense of expectations about what they can expect.
And so how would the FCC's rules protect that personal information that I just outlined amongst thousands of other poten...
So how about if I need a loan and I've gone to one of those websites?
And common carriers have always been.
I guess the way I would view it is you put HIPAA on the books, you put FERPA on the books----
In other words, the ISP says, 'Please give us the right to sell all of your private information.'
