I'm committed to strengthening the Older Americans Act.

This is for Vice Admiral. Thank you for your testimony.

I just can't underscore the importance of the reauthorization of the Older Americans Act.

I'm glad that, Ms. Hartmann, you brought up the fact that very often it's these churches who are doing the work for Meals on Wheels.

This is something that we're doing at a time when there just is a refusal to ask people who, in our economy, are doing extraordinarily well.

Because of the Affordable Care Act, seniors who purchase brand-name drugs in the donut hole now this year are receiving a 50 percent discount on those drugs.

I am very concerned that we honor your pledge to keep faith with those who have served.

I am absolutely clear, I would like to hear from both of you that you are adamantly opposed to that happening, to changing those retirement benefits for our serving men and women.

It had to be zero?

So the court ruled that because an infinitesimal number of people could get their money back, their $3 a month back, then you could not go to court?

So when we are using empirical research, there are numbers and then there are damn lies, right?

The Unabomber could have avoided a mandatory arbitration clause.

I would submit that they do not know their--I do not think this is voluntary.

That hardly seems like due process.

OK. I believe one of the witnesses, either Mr. Schwartz or Mr. Drahozal--I think it was Mr. Schwartz--said that one of the myths is there is not due process.

Because infinitesimal was good.

I am sticking around for a third round. I am not sure if you have to go.

I mean, it is an amazing coincidence about that, and I think that it is too bad our colleagues are not here to be as upset about that as they would be.