I do not think this bill is going to pass. It will pass out of this committee... But on the floor it will not.
We need to wean ourselves off of foreign oil, at least the excessive reliance we have, and this will not do it.
The science is mixed. And the louder they say the science is settled, the greater, to me, it seems that they have nothin...
We need to try to do it in a way that does not have huge costs for families, and does not do grave damage to our economy...
To have more nuclear and get ourselves off foreign oil and gas ought to be a big goal of what we are doing.
The public perception has totally changed.
If the President would give the same kind of aggressive interest to building 100 new nuclear power plants that he does t...
So, my question to the committee, and it will be throughout all of this, is why are we ignoring the cheap energy solutio...
Somebody is going to pay that. That works out to be about $900 per family the way my math figures it.
But for the next 20 years, if we really want to deal with global warming, we really only have one option. And that is to...
If what we are really interested in is reducing carbon, which is the principle greenhouse gas, we could focus first on s...
We say yes to a greater access to all sources of clean and reliable energy we have right here at home.
the public will find out. And when they do, they will reject those schemes and reject the spin and they will look instea...
You can be sure of this: once the American public realizes what this legislation will do to their wallets, they will res...
I believe that this committee, when the votes are eventually taken on our bill, will reflect our President's attitude wh...
I would note that the Senate has voted on cap-and-trade three times: in 2003, in 2005, and in 2008. In each and every in...
We say no to higher energy costs, no to subsidizing the East and West Coasts at the expense of the heartland, no to more...
I honestly do not believe that process debates like this are serving the American people.
