Costs matter. We should be looking for the cheap, easy way to do this, not for the hard, expensive way to do it.
As to the fact that it does not cost anything, well somebody is going to be paying up to $100 billion a year.
Do you really think, in this Washington environment, that these things are going to rebated back? I think probably not.
If we enact cap-and-trade legislation, fuel prices will rise, and more jobs in the trucking sector will be lost.
Supporters of cap-and-trade say it is all worth it because their policy would help break our dependence on foreign oil.
We want to expand all domestic production, all forms of energy.
Whatever the solution, we can't lessen our dependence on foreign oil through taxes, mandates, and bureaucracy.
the devil is in the details. Unfortunately, this devil has the potential to devastate our economy, reduce the standard o...
Here's what I actually said, and what I predicted, 4 years ago:
we have a colossal mess on our hands, created in large part by litigation.
CAIR is significantly more vulnerable to court challenges than Clear Skies would have been and will undoubtedly be held ...
I think that the protection of our native wildlife from harmful invasive species should receive increased Federal attent...
The costs are disproportionate. It is the Heartland that is paying for the East Coast and the West Coast.
Well, what about water that collected in a ditch? You see, this is what I am really concerned about----
Do think that sometimes, sometimes, not always, but sometimes, that Washington knows more about, and should be involved ...
That it would go so far and, quite frankly, if you feel, if you do not feel, that the Federal jurisdiction should come t...
This lack of responsiveness is a real impediment to us in fulfilling our constitutional duties over oversight.
Any policy that Congress considers should include a reasonable risk analysis process that would take into consideration ...
