We should have had an opportunity to debate this issue and look at the consequences far beyond just the immediate impact...
We all share the same common objective, and that is to prevent Iran from being a nuclear weapons state.
Not just this administration, other administrations, this country, we do not have a great record dealing with rogue nati...
This committee is more nonpartisan, not bipartisan, nonpartisan. This is about national security. It is about global sec...
We are not there yet. We are working very closely with the IAEA to make sure that they have full insight.
We will be watching their actions to the U.N. resolution violation because to me it is telling whether we will have zero...
A lot of the activities in Iran are not new, and we should not expect that it will change.
But we also know about U.S. leadership and what the United States must do for zero tolerance of violations.
I think there is unanimous support in the United States Senate for zero tolerance for violations by Iran.
We need to make sure we do not lose sight of that gross violation of that individual's rights.
Together we want to work to make sure that Iran does not attain a nuclear weapon capacity.
Failure to impose any consequences on Iran for violations of the U.N. Security Council resolutions and other destabilizi...
I do not deny that this administration or the next administration, whether it is a Democratic or Republican administrati...
I think this committee had to set an all-time record on the number of hearings and briefings, which I think was because ...
We are going to be watching very closely and we are going to be prepared to do what we need to, to make it clear that we...
But the problem is Iran is pushing forward currently under sanctions in a lot of different regions and in a lot of diffe...
We entered into these diplomatic negotiations because of the significance of Iran in the Middle East.
Is there anything that Congress should do now, in contemplation of this agreement going forward?