First, productivity does not necessarily increase with a shortened work week in the longterm.
There has been a concerning pattern from Democrats prioritizing policies to help politically connected unions at the expense of the workers ...
I don't think the Federal Government should mandate it, frankly, just to kind of placate a Democratic political base.
There are significant statistical flaws in all of the studies I have examined and are regularly touted as proof of concept for the shortened...
The requirement to pay overtime over 8 hours will be a significant economic adverse impact on many companies.
Folks want jobs, and they want decent pay. I agree with that entirely.
The 32 hour work week with no loss in pay, my staff has volunteered to be the test case for that.
This proposal only works if you reduce 8 hours a workweek and have the workers have the same level of productivity that they had at 40 hours...
there is nothing to prevent a business like Mr. Leland or Temple University Hospital for a select group of employees to have a policy which ...
We need to reexamine it. The amount of litigation that occurs regarding the Fair Labor Standards Act is way over the top.
The Administration's assault on workers flexibility and employers via rulemaking is unacceptable.
A mandatory 32 hour workweek is bad policy.
Let the market determine how the distribution of wealth is to occur.
This is bad policy as it results to the consumer.
I look at France's unemployment rate among the youth. It is like 17 percent.
Flexibility is what we need.
We commend the Committee for starting a discussion about the Fair Labor Standards Act.
