So the fact that you discussed the future of a country's wealth without any Congolese voices is very disturbing.
For us, without us, it is against us.
I am concerned that Section 1502 is putting us in the wrong direction.
Do you have any concern that we may just sort of say, 'Okay, we are done. We passed Section 1502.'
I have no doubt, Ms. Pickles, that minerals have a role in this conflict, but so do agricultural products.
Neither one of those companies files an income tax with the United States.
What is the impact on U.S. tax revenue if U.S. multinationals can enter into cost-sharing agreements with offshore compa...
You made a decision, which you have a right to do, not to bring that money home.
That agreement did two things: it shifted the economic rights, the way they had been shifted before, 30 years ago.
Is that a fact that you look at?
You at the IRS and the Treasury Department can change the allocation if you find it necessary to prevent--excuse me. I w...
Is it fair to say that they were withdrawn because of pressure from the Hill, Capitol Hill, and business interests?
I think it is clear that Apple engages in tax gimmicks.
Have you seen the study that shows that 30 of our most profitable corporations over a period of 3 years recently paid no...
Well, from our perspective, from what we have seen, it is rare.
I think I would characterize the original characterization of Subpart F is to prevent the shifting of passive income abr...
It is important for us that we know what is going on if we are going to change it in a sensible way.
Is it true that you are not going to bring them home unless we reduce our tax rates?
